Page 5, n. (s), add "Lavery v. Pursell, 39 Ch. D. 508, 518."

12, n. (j), add at end "Dickinson v. Barrow, 1904, 2 Ch. 339, 334." 54, n. (n), add "See Re Jackson and Baden's Contract, 1905, 1 Ch. 603."

85, last line but five, after "title," add a note referring to Re Nisbet and Potts' Contract, 1905, 1 Ch. 391, 401. 97, n. (q), add " Clippens Oil Co. v. Edinburgh, etc. Trustees, 1904, A. C.

64, 69; Heath v. Deane, 1905, 2 Ch. 86, 93." 100, n. (z), add " As to what is a public document, see Mercer v. Donne, 1904, 2 Ch. 534 ; 1905, 2 Ch. 538." 122, n. (j), add "Moulton v. Edmonds, 1 De G. F. & J. 246, 251." 124, n. (i), add "Re Goodrich, 1904, P. 138."

125, n. (j), add "As to the presumption of marriage, see Re Shephard, 1904, 1 Ch. 456, and cases there cited." 127, n. (y), add "Moulton v. Edmonds, 1 De G. F. & J. 246, 248."

148, n. (d), add "Re Jackson and Haden's Contract, 1905, 1 Ch. 603."

163, n. (o), add "Hume v. Pocock, L. R. 1 Ch. 379, 385."

173, n. (c), add "Berwick v. Price, 1905, 1 Ch. 632."

179, n. (o), add "Pepin v. Bruyère, 1902, 1 Ch. 24." l92, n. (n), add "When an administrator is appointed, his title relates back to the death ; Re Pryse, 1904, P. 301." 192, n. (o), add "There is no right of retainer out of real estate; Re Williams, 1904, 1 Ch. 52." l94, n. (t), add " So held, Kemp v. Inland Revenue Commrs., 1905, 1 K. B.

581, deciding that no stamp is necessary where the assent is given in writing not under seal." 197, n. (i), add " now reported, 1903, 2 Ch. 583."

212, n. (s), add " affirmed, 1904, 1 K. B. 762 ; 1905, A. C. 406."

216, n. {j), add "Re Repington, 1904, 1 Ch. 811, 814."

217, n. (k), add " affirmed, 1905, A. C. 406."

217, n. [m), add "But see 2 Dart, V. & P. 667 ; Davidson, Prec. Conv., vol. 2, pt. 1, pp. 253, n., 313, n., 4th ed.; Davidson's Concise Precedents, 175, n., 18th ed." 224, n. (z), add " A.-G. v. Montagu, reversed, 1904, A. C. 316."

Page 225, n. (f), add "A.-G. v. Murray, 1904, 1 K. B. 165; A.-G. v. Leth-bridge, 1905, 2 K. B. 323."

227, n. (q), add "A.-G. v. Londesborough, 1905, 1 K. B. 98." 232, n. (o), add "Re Bolton Estates Act, 1863, 1904, 2 Ch. 289." 232, n. (p), add "Such settlement estate duty does not come under the head of testamentary expenses; Re King, 1904, 1 Ch. 363. And see Re Cayley, 1904, 2 Ch. 781 ; Re Turnbull, 190.5, 1 Ch. 726."

235, n. (g), add "See lord Advocate v Moray, 1905, A. C. 531, 539; Re Bote, 1905, 2 Ch. 384."

245, n. (y), add "A.-G. v. Londesborough, 1905, 1 K. B. 98."

247, n. (p), add "A.-G. v. Montagu, reversed, 1904, A. C. 316."

248, n. (x), add "So held, Lord Advocate v. Moray, 1905, A. C. 531, 539."

256, n. (r), add "See Re Loveridge, 1904, 1 Ch. 518."

257, n. (s), add "Re Valletort, etc. Laundry Co., 1903, 2 Ch. 654, 659 sg."

259, n. (c), add "And see Re Valletort, etc. Laundry Co., 1903, 2 Ch. 654, 663."

260 n (e) add "Berwick v. Price, 1905, 1 Ch 632"

266 nn. (i,l) add "Berwick v. Price, 1905, 1 Ch. 632."

268, n. (t), add "Carlyon v. Truscott, L. R. 20 Eq. 348."

277, nu. (n, o), add "See also Re Ware, 1892, 1 Ch. 344, 347 ; Re A. B., 1899, W. N. 233." 281, n. (n), add "Re Smith, 1904, 1 Ch. 139."

282, n. (o), add " As to the effect of a disclaimer by all the trustees or the only trustee, see Mallott v. Wilson, 1903, 2 Ch. 494." 289, n. (i), add " Re Smith, 1904, 1 Ch. 139." 297, n. (d), Re Jenkins and Randal's Contract is now reported, 1903, 2 Ch. 362. 301, n. (y), add " Hurrell v. Littlejohn, 1904, 1 Ch. 689."

303, n. (d), add " Re Scholefield, 1905, 2 Ch. 408."

308, n. (e), add " Pease v. Courtney, 1904, 2 Ch. 503."

316, last line but one, after "deeds" add a note referring to Re Philli-more's Estate, 1904, 2 Ch. 460 ; Re Marshall's Settlement, 1905, 2 Ch. 325.

318, n. (w), add "Re Coull's Settled Estates, 1905, 1 Ch. 712."

319, n. (aa), add "So held, Re Wimborne and Browne's Contract, 1904, 1 Ch.537" 322, n. (k), " " "

335, n. (s), add "Hurrell v. Littlejohn, 1904, 1 Ch. 689."

338, n. (/), add "If, however, after such a release any other interests created by or under the settlement should remain outstanding, it is thought that the powers of the tenant for life would not be extinguished; see Re Wimborne and Browne's Contract, 1904, 1 Ch. 537: Re Phillimore's Estate, 1904, 2 Ch. 400; Re Marshall's Settlement, 1905, 2 Ch. 325."

Page 345, n. (x), Hodson v. Beans is now reported, 1903, 2 Ch. 647.

353, n. (a), add " S. C, nom. Fryer v. Ewart, 1902, A. C. 187."

354, n. (e), add "See now per Romer, L. J., Re Allen and Driscoll's Contract, 1904, 2 Ch. 226."

360, n. (h), add "See Re Spark's Lease, 1905, 1 Ch. 456."

369, n. (h), add "Capital and Counties Bank, Ltd. v. Rhodes, 1903, 1 Ch.

631, 654." 371, n. (q), substitute "Land Transfer Rules (1903), 69."

371, n. (r), for "Land Transfer Rides (June, 1899), r. 60," substitute "Land Transfer Rules (1903), 70"; and for "Land Transfer Rules, 1898, Nos. 43 - 57," substitute "Land Transfer Rules (1903), 50-67."

373, n. (x), add "See also pp. 646, 1074 - 1081, below."

384, n. (o), add "James v. Salter, 3 Bing. N. C. 544; Irish Land Commission v. Grant, 10 App. Cas. 14, 26, 27; Howitt v. Harrington, 1893, 2 Ch. 497, 504, 507."

386, line 13, for "Central Office of Supreme Court" read "Office of Land Registry."

386, n. (d), add "Stat. 63 & 64 Vict. c. 26, s. 21, and Order thereunder, W. N., 18th Aug. 1900."

402, n. (q), add "And the Acts consolidated may be referred to as a guide to the meaning of the consolidating enactment, if ambiguous; R. v. Abrahams, 1904, 2 K. B. 859."

405, n. (i), add "A.-G. v. National Epileptic Hospital, 1904, 2 Ch. 252." 405, n. [1), add in paragraph (2) " see Re Dod's Charity, 1905, 1 Ch. 442." 410, n. (e), add "See Wray v. Wray, 1905, 2 Ch. 349, 352." 413, n. (a;), add "In Re Bourne, 1906, 1 Ch. 113, it was held by Farwell, J., that, where articles of partnership provide for the purchase by the surviving partner of the share of a deceased partner, an equitable mortgage made by the surviving partner, who continued to carry on the business, by deposit of the title deeds of land, which had belonged to the firm, to secure his own private debt, took priority over the lien of the deceased partner's executors for the unpaid purchase money. This was so decided on the authority of Re Langmead's Trusts (20 Beav. 20; 7 De G. M. & G. 353), deciding that a surviving partner has authority to mortgage a policy of life assurance forming part of the assets of the partnership to raise money to pay the debts of the firm, and the mortgagee is not concerned to see or enquire as to the application of the mortgage money. As it appears that each partner has authority during the continuance of the partnership to make an equitable mortgage of any land belonging to the partnership to raise money for the purposes of the business of the firm, it seems that no fault can be found with the actual decision in Re Bourne; since the authority of each partner to bind the firm continues after the dissolution of the partnership, so far as may be necessary to wind up the affairs thereof. (See above, Vol. I., pp. 412, 413.) But the reporter of the case of Be Bourne has prefaced it with the head note 'A surviving partner can mortgage or sell partnership real estate for the purposes of the business, and the mortgagee or purchaser is not concerned to see to the application of the money unless he has notice that it is going to be used for an improper purpose.' No such general proposition is laid down in the judgment; and it is submitted that the decision in this case is no authority for the statement in the head note as regards the sale by a surviving partner of partnership real estate. It does not appear that one partner has authority during the continuance of the partnership to sell real estate belonging to the partnership, except where the ordinary business of the firm is to sell land; and there is therefore a difficulty about the sale by a surviving partner of partnership real estate, which does not occur in the case of an equitable mortgage. (See above, Vol. I., pp. 412, 413; and Butchart v. Dresser, 10 Hare, 453, 456, 4 De G. M. & G. 542, 544; West of England, etc. Bank v. Murch, 23 Ch. D. 138, which were not cited in Re Bourne.)"