Evidence in an action for broker's commissions held sufficient to show that he procured a purchaser on the terms named by defendant, and that the purchaser refused to enter into a contract because defendant sought to vary the terms. Milne v. Ingersoll Segeant Drill Co., 104 N. Y. S. 1053, 120 App. Div. 465; Millan v. Porter, 31 Mo. App. 563; Buckingham v. Harris, 10 Colo. 455, 15 Pac. 817; Smith v. Fairchild, 7 Colo. 510, 4 P. 757; Finley v. Dyer, 79 Mo. App. 604; McQuillen v. Carpenter, 72 N. Y. App. Div. 595, 76 S. 556; Beebe v. Ranger, 35 N. Y. Super. Ct. 452; Gorman v. Scholle. 13 Daly, 516; Michaelis v. Rufmann, 76 N. Y. S. 973, 37 Misc. 830; Halprin v. Schachne, 57 N. Y. S. 735, 27 Misc. 195; Hattenback v. Gundersheimer, 13 N. Y. S. 814.