(23) In broker's action for commission, evidence held to show that negotiations with prospective purchaser procured by broker were broken off for want of an acceptable offer, and that subsequently selling property, defendant did not know that such prospective purchaser was interested in the purchase. Treacy v. Oilman, 171 S. W. 153, 161 Ky. 513.

(24) Evidence held insufficient to show that plaintiff's authority to act as defendant's broker in the transaction relied on had expired before the sale was made. Reed v. Libby, 84 A. 1001, 109 Me. 568.

(25) In an action against a lessor for a commission for negotiating a lease, evidence held to show that the proposition to defendant came from plaintiff as the representative of the lessee. Gordon v. First Universalist Society of Marlborough, 104 N. E. 448, 217 Mass. 30.

(26) Evidence held insufficient to show that the vendor left money with defendant wherewith to pay plaintiff. Edwards v. Thoman, 153 N. W. 806, 187 Mich. 361.

(27) Evidence held sufficient to show a general contract of agency for the sale of land, so as to entitle plaintiff broker to his commission, whether the land was sold at the price originally demanded or not. Lerner v. Harvey, 166 N. W. 427, 189 Mich. 249.

(28) The owner gave a proposed purchaser an option to purchase the land, if the holder of a prior existing option failed to purchase. The sale was made to a party not named in the first option, and who claimed the right to purchase thereunder. Held, in an action to recover commission for procuring a person ready to buy under the second option, that a finding that the party to whom the sale was in fact made was not entitled to purchase under the first option was not sustained by the evidence. Frys v. Wakefield, 120 N. W. 35, 107 Minn. 291.

(29) Evidence, in an action on notes, where a defendant real estate broker interposed a counterclaim for a commission; held, to sustain a finding that defendant, in procuring purchasers for land, was working for plaintiff individually, and not for the corporation which he represented. Kenniston v. Haw, 144 N. W. 452, 124 Minn. 140.

(30) Evidence, in a broker's action for commission; held, to sustain finding that the owner did not himself sell the property. Wright v. Waite, 148 N. W. 50, 126 Minn. 115.

(31) Evidence, in an action for commission of $2 per acre on a sale of land; held, to sustain a finding for plaintiff as to the terms of the employment contract. Glaum v. Skang, 150 N. W. 760, 129 Minn. 377.

(32) In an action against directors of a trust company for agreed compensation for procuring land, evidence held not to show any contractual relation of Board of Directors with plaintiff or their authority to a co-director to represent them. Bart-lett v. Garrett, 175 S. W. 79, 188 Mo. App. 144.

(33) In an action for commission for procuring a tenant able to pay part of expenses of erecting a building on defendant's lots, evidence held to show that an agreement between defendant and the prospective tenant, of a certain date, had been abandoned by mutual consent, and no new agreement made. Herron v. Cameron, 128 N. Y. Sup. 871, 144 App. Div. 43.

(34) Part of testimony of plaintiff, in an action by a broker against M. and B., husband and wife, for commissions for introducing a customer, "I had a conversation with M. and B. as to who owned the property. He told me the two were the owners, but she is the one of record. She was there. She said, 'There is no difference, me or my husband; he does the work for me.'" It cannot be said plaintiff offered no evidence either of ownership by M. or of authorization by him, on his own account, to sell the property. Gordon v. Rosenthal, 130 N. Y. Sup. 226.

(35) In an action by a broker to recover compensation for procuring a person willing to lease defendant's building, evidence held sufficient to raise implied promise on the part of defendant to pay for the broker's services. Einhorn v. P. Derby & Co., 132 K Y. Sup. 327.

(36) Evidence held to show entire amount was agreed to be paid to plaintiff brokers as a commission for selling realty. Levy v. Sonneborn, 138 K Y. Sup. 285, 78 Misc. Rep. 50.

(37) Evidence, in a broker's action to recover commission for a sale or exchange of defendant's property; held, insufficient to sustain a finding that the services were rendered gratuitously. Silberkraus v. Winnie, 142 N. Y. Sup. 887, 158 App. Div. 50.

(38) In an action by a broker to recover commissions, evidence held insufficient to show that defendant, the seller, was guilty of any act which prevented the consummation of the transaction. Ruth v. Neiheiser, 152 W. Y. Sup. 998.

(39) Evidence held insufficient to show that plaintiff sold or procured purchasers for the property within the time and on the terms specified in his agency contract. Chambers v. Simmons, 85 S. E. 182, 76 W. Va. 174.

(40) Evidence, in an action to recover a broker's commission in the amount fixed by written contract, containing terms as to lease, payment, building, and other terms; held, to sustain finding that the arrangement as finally completed and carried out between purchaser and the defendant was considered by them as fulfillment of the contract. Jno. E. Be Wolf Co. v. Harvey, 154 N. W. 988, 161 Wis. 535.

(41) Evidence held to sustain a finding that principal revoked his broker's authority in bad faith, so as to be liable for commission. Howard v. Street, 93 A. 923, 125 Md. 289.

(42) In an action by broker for commissions for making a sale of real estate of the wife, under an employment by her husband, evidence held to sustain a finding of the revocation in bad faith.

of the broker's authority, authorizing a recovery. O'Connell v. Casey, 92 N. E. 804, 206 Mass. 520.

(43) Evidence, in an action for broker's commissions for securing a loan; held, to show that defendant withdrew its proposition before the person secured by plaintiff to furnish the money had accepted it. Von Bayer v. Ninigret Mills Co., 134 N. Y. Sup. 116, 149 App. Div. 578.